The dominance of the Bologna system in Round 4 has been a topic of interest for many years, with various arguments and counterarguments being made.

On one hand, proponents argue that the Bologna system is necessary to ensure fair competition among European universities and that it helps to promote academic excellence. They claim that the system provides a level playing field for students and researchers from different countries, which can lead to innovation and growth.

On the other hand, critics argue that the Bologna system is not always effective in promoting academic excellence or ensuring fairness. Some argue that the system fails to address the root causes of inequality in higher education, such as poverty and lack of access to resources.

Furthermore, some argue that the Bologna system does not adequately address the needs of students who may face barriers to accessing higher education due to factors like language barriers, financial constraints, or mobility restrictions. In these cases, they suggest that there should be more flexibility and support for these students.

In conclusion, while the Bologna system may have its advantages in terms of promoting academic excellence and ensuring fairness, it also faces several challenges and limitations. Therefore, it remains to be seen whether this system will continue to play a significant role in shaping the future of higher education in Europe.